Join our growing community to challenge mainstream media bias and fix the news
WHO, 23 nations back pandemic treaty to tackle future health crises

WHO, 23 nations back pandemic treaty to tackle future health crises

The WHO and leaders of 23 countries backed the idea of a global treaty that would help the world deal with future health emergencies like the Covid-19 pandemic. The treaty would seek to ensure universal and equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for future pandemics. The 23 countries are a mixture of rich and poor nations and represent every continent except North America.

Clara
Clara
David
David 3 weeks

23 countries collectively agree that the USA must pay for the bulk of everything done globally all the time. This isn't a 'North America' thing. Doesn't matter if the topic is climate, defense, or disease. Its not like the world expects Canada or Mexico to step up. Its always about USA.

Russell
Russell 3 weeks

The WHO exposed themselves as a mouthpiece for CCP propaganda, which directly lead to the preventable deaths of millions and massive global economic damage. Not until the WHO can demonstrate that it has made the internal changes required to insure that it will never again risk the world's health, simply to protect the CCP ego will I regard anything they recommend or report with any credibility.

godhillie
godhillie 3 weeks

They must think we wont fight back against this garbage. Everyday its another assault on morality, privacy, and sovereignty...

Chris
Chris 3 weeks

The idea and principle sounds good but thats all. The idea of pushing vaccines as the only way to deal with a pathogen as if that is the panacae of everything is wholly and utterly repulsive and crucially is not at all for health but tied into politics of power. I thought the WHO were supposed to be the 'overseers' on world health but are subservient to controlling moguls and bent governments.

Yosef
Yosef 3 weeks

I hope that that treaty not only gets signed but also that it never loses its power over the decades the way that many public health monitoring initiatives that were founded in the 1990s or 2000s have been doing. Moreover, I hope that similar treaties will be signed for various natural disasters, not just for floods, hurricanes/cyclones and earthquakes, but also for volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, etc.

Deet
Deet 3 weeks

Was a stupid idea. Lets just focus on ourselves

jon
jon 3 weeks

Because international organizations that feed off the American taxpayer have been SUCH a success..

geckouni
geckouni 3 weeks

Or maybe not so smart afterall...

Andrew Kenney
Andrew Kenney 3 weeks

23 countries that want future lock downs when they want to implement them.

Tachyon
Tachyon 3 weeks

Wanna bet it also includes vaccine passports?

ttocsick
ttocsick 3 weeks

WHO could give two phuks

Skot
Skot 3 weeks

Oh, the fine print...

Darth Vader
Darth Vader 3 weeks

Right because the World Health Organization has always been so trustworthy.

Colton
Colton 3 weeks

Honestly sounds like a good idea for the poorer nations and a terrible strain on the rich

Doug
Doug 3 weeks

Surprised this doesn't already exist

World
World 2 weeks

Global Health Mafia!!!

Mindaugas
Mindaugas 3 weeks

How many countries there are in the world?? 23 basically means nothing

IIzard
IIzard 3 weeks

Because the who have been trustworthy...

geckouni
geckouni 3 weeks

If it is always about US, why US wants to be part of it? US must be quite smart to know the pro and con..

The Oracle8191
The Oracle8191 3 weeks

Oh, not Taiwan? How surprising 😑

Top in World