Supreme Court upholds Indiana abortion law on human remains

Supreme Court upholds Indiana abortion law on human remains

The Supreme Court has upheld an Indiana law that requires abortion providers to treat aborted children the same as remains from other deaths. SCOTUS did not give an opinion about the rest of the argument, having to do with who can legally have an abortion.

themdg
themdg
Petri Fide
Petri Fide 7 months

Obviously Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor believe there should be a market for women to make a profit from selling their aborted fetuses to pharmaceutical companies.

OzWolf67
OzWolf67 7 months

Truth will prevail - once it was the norm to call slaves less than human. Today some still call a fetus less than human, but others (still) disagree to both. Only a person has the authority to donate there bodies to science after their death.

Rocky LeBlanc
Rocky LeBlanc 7 months

One more state where planned parenthood has their revenue stream cut. I can't wait for that evil organization to wither and die.

Watheverable GRAMPS
Watheverable GRAMPS 7 months

"Murdering the unborn and using their remains for profit is the abortionists constitutional right" - Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Watheverable GRAMPS
Watheverable GRAMPS 7 months

RBG can't stop herself from helping murderers profit from their victim's remains!

Rocky LeBlanc
Rocky LeBlanc 7 months

“The use of abortion to achieve eugenic goals is not merely hypothetical. The foundations for legalizing abortion in America were laid during the early 20th-century birth-control movement. That movement developed alongside the American eugenics movement,” Justice Thomas wrote. And yet people still fight for abortion even knowing it is a tool of oppression designed to kill off minorities. “I would have thought it could go without saying that nothing in the Constitution or any decision of this court prevents a state from requiring abortion facilities to provide for the respectful treatment of human remains,” Justice Thomas said. What is not specifically governed by the constitution is the domain of the state. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor would have denied the state’s petition to uphold the disposal law. Of course they did. They are literally demons. I usually try to assume that all people have mostly good intentions, but these two seem to have been hand picked for their malevolence.

Andrew 1010
Andrew 1010 7 months

...Fetal Remains? Wait wait what was this ruling about?

Daniel McEwen
Daniel McEwen 7 months

Waste if resources. Yes, we want to minimize number of abortions, but once they have died why not use them for stem cell research?

Seed
Seed 7 months

Sex and race-selective abortions aren't going to be illegal.... hmm...... that's brilliant PR for the Chinese (sex) and the alt-right (race)

Top in U.S.
Get the App