Join our growing community to challenge mainstream media bias and fix the news
NRA sues San Francisco over terrorist declaration

NRA sues San Francisco over terrorist declaration

The National Rifle Association (NRA) sued San Francisco on Monday over the city’s recent declaration that the lobby is a ’domestic terrorist organization’. The lawsuit accuses city officials of violating the gun lobby’s free speech rights for political reasons. The suit also claimed that the move says the city is seeking to blacklist anyone associated with the NRA.

Timothy
Timothy
John Doh
John Doh 1 year

Alternate Headline: 23% of voters think civil rights are terroristic.

MEIJIN44
MEIJIN44 1 year

So 77% of all people have relatively good sense. Nice to know.

Dave
Dave 1 year

So they declared the NRA terrorists before Antifa?

David O'Doherty
David O'Doherty 1 year

23% of voters are f****** retarded

Prismarine
Prismarine 1 year

"Protect our kids" >Supports abortion

Mister Manager
Mister Manager 1 year

Why don't they move to countries where gun control is the policy, instead of trying (and failing) to overturn 2A?

Small town conspiracy 1776
Small town conspiracy 1776 1 year

We all (including myself) need to join Gun Owners of America! GOA truly believes in the constitution in saying there shall be no infringement on our 2nd amendment rights “shall not be infringed” means shall not be infringed period.

IIZard
IIZard 1 year

Good shit, NRA. Don't roll over for commies

Monster Mash
Monster Mash 1 year

so they wouldn't win the vote then? ok nice spin msm.

Liberty Justice
Liberty Justice 1 year

Survey was taken online, I believe, with one thousand participants. The questions couldn't be more suggestive and I wonder which cities/states were involved? No more info given beyond that. *clicked "survey" on wash times article*

BJ
BJ 1 year

Dems created the KKK, Republicans created the NRA to fight the KKK. Now the Dems are killing millions of black unborn babies, and the Republicans/(conservative Republicans)are still fighting them. These 'enlightened ', 'open minded ', liberal moron SHEEP have the gall to call the NRA terrorists. If you happen to be a liberal leftist Democrat and you are reading this, next time you are in a library check out the History section.

Morbo
Morbo 1 year

Well consider the city in question, human excrement and needles cover the streets due to the policies of these delutional idiots. An accusation from them holds about as much water as a bowel made from tissue paper.

OttersGonnaOtt
OttersGonnaOtt 1 year

The NRA has a case here. As an officially recognized lobbying group their publications are protected by the First Amendment. San Fransisco's legal definition of the NRA as a terrorist group not only apparently happened to silence them, but legally it bans their publications outright as well as anyone that directly supports them, impinging individual citizen First Amendment rights. The First Amendment explicitly declares that no state power shall prevent the free speech of any party within its purview. San Fransisco is outright in the wrong. The NRA would need to traverse the line of calling others to action or committing action that is against the law before they can legally be defined as terrorists. Words are protected, not actions.

Marcus Rogers
Marcus Rogers 1 year

Honestly isn't subverting the laws for a rogue state and going against the government more terrorism then anything the NRA has done?....I'm surprised they haven't locked up the officials in California as part of human rights violations, at this point it's basically a 3rd world state because if the Democrats.

(Un)Fortunate Son
(Un)Fortunate Son 1 year

Good. First amendment violations should not be taken lightly.

Property
Property 1 year

California being fucking stupid, as usually

Kait P
Kait P 1 year

Those arms tho 😍

Unity.Nat
Unity.Nat 1 year

Would they prefer if everyone responsible was not with the NRA?

EightBall
EightBall 1 year

I think the City of San Francisco is a domestic terrorist organization.

Katharine
Katharine 1 year

How come no one is holding that gun?

Top in Politics