Nationwide injunction against Trump asylum limits again placed on hold

Nationwide injunction against Trump asylum limits again placed on hold

The Supreme Court upheld a Trump administration policy that requires anyone seeking asylum to apply in a third country first. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ended a nationwide injunction against the policy but allowed it to stay in effect within its jurisdiction, which includes the border states of California and Arizona.

Tom A
Tom A
porcus
porcus 4 months

VERY broad support within SCOTUS - 7 out of 9 justices agreeing with the Trump administration. But you can bet that the Left will shrilly screech about how wrong the SCOTUS is on this ruling, instead of examining their own flawed beliefs.

porcus
porcus 4 months

BOOM! SCOTUS has stopped the Leftist 9th circuit court's interference so hopefully the US can get some progress made on this.

WWG1WGA
WWG1WGA 4 months

More proof the crypt keeper Ruth Bader Ginsberg needs to retire

porcus
porcus 4 months

Also, hopefully Trump is able to replace EVEN MORE of the 9th circuit court's justices - 13 out of 29 is a nice start but I think it would be better to have a clean majority.

bobby_5150
bobby_5150 4 months

Can we get an injunction on the 9th circuit?

Andrew 1010
Andrew 1010 4 months

Yes finally SCOTUS gets it rolling.

Andrew 1010
Andrew 1010 4 months

Which is a rational and reasonable approach and stance to take.

IvoryDove
IvoryDove 4 months

We're so lucky the "Supreme Court" has decided the law s for us. Imagine living in a country where the people are in charge, rather than 9 judges telling us what laws they like, and what laws they don't. The fact is.. A judge shouldn't be able to stop law enforcement from enforcing laws that are passed by congress and signed by the POTUS. Period. We don't need the Supreme Court to tell us that.

John Wilson
John Wilson 4 months

yea these decisions to block have become automatic. that clearly is abusing the system. they have to fast track these or require more circuits to agree. checks and balances don't work if they are not performer in good faith. this goes way beyond politics, it is undermining our republic. but perhaps that is thier goal, to let it burn.

Luficer Morningstar
Luficer Morningstar 4 months

not anymore ;)

Michael Tatom
Michael Tatom 4 months

Finally.

porcus
porcus 4 months

Nothing wrong with this policy, good on the SCOTUS for the 7-9 ruling.

FirstCensorshipThenJail
FirstCensorshipThenJail 4 months

Warning shots fired. Next up, judges removed from the bench for willfully subverting the constitution and judicial overreach to destabilize the union and the legal system. Purge the communists.

Paul C
Paul C 4 months

OK.

Top in World
Get the App