Second whistleblower in Trump-Ukraine scandal comes forward

Second whistleblower in Trump-Ukraine scandal comes forward

Reports suggest that the lawyer for a whistleblower who revealed President Trump’s phone call with Ukraine’s leader is representing a second whistleblower who has spoken with the intelligence community. Mark Zaid confirmed in an interview that the second official, also from the US intelligence community, has been interviewed by the inspector general.

Kathy
Kathy
Life of Ri
Life of Ri 4 months

What scandal? Another story blown out of proportion to get clicks. The media is truly rotten...

Curtis Miller
Curtis Miller 4 months

Seems fairly telling that when the Legacy Media and DS threatens Trump he says “Bring It” and when Biden is confronted he flips out.

Tsila Noitan (Backer)
Tsila Noitan (Backer) 4 months

there need to be consequences for calling someone a whistleblower who doesn't have credible accusations.

Got Truth
Got Truth 4 months

So the Ukrainian President saying that there was no pressure isn’t enough? After knowing that, who would ever take this second witness seriously? How dumb does the MSM and the Deep State think we are?

Nicholas Noel
Nicholas Noel 4 months

So, can I get a list of people that where in on this call. Or... do I have to wait.

porcus
porcus 4 months

This is such a nasty smear - anonymous "heroes" risking everything to stand up against the Orange Man Bad. Or so the narrative goes. Where is the evidence? Where is the crime? Nowhere, but it doesn't matter because... whistleblower.

Paulie C.
Paulie C. 4 months

If the "whistleblower" is another somebody who may have heard something from someone else...I expect we'll have more. Because the normal rules only apply to Republicans.

Roadhog
Roadhog 4 months

All I hear is the sound of desperation.

ICblades
ICblades 4 months

first it was Russia nonsense then kavanaugh now "whistleblowers" are we going to need to make a government policy that when an opposing party takes office we fire the other side from all governmental roles? I know Democrats have very little loyalty so maybe after all the dust settles we could just remove all the ones working in government.

Based Haole
Based Haole 4 months

so another Intelligence Asset proves that JFK was right when he decided to dismantle the CIA.

Edmond_Dantes
Edmond_Dantes 4 months

And the second "whistleblower" is again, from the "intelligence community". CIA? FBI? What antiquated bureaucracy wants to overthrow our duely-elected President now!

Crimson Jester
Crimson Jester 4 months

Much as with Kavanah, there will be time unconfirmed stories before it's through. With as many, unnamed "whistleblowers", as well. All of which is another Grand Nothing-burger.

Nika D
Nika D 4 months

I’m an independent, but democrats are going to lose in this. Most people hate government corruption (and even worse when it involves nepotism), and Biden and son are going to come out the losers here.

Bulk Smash!!!
Bulk Smash!!! 4 months

Well! I guess that means they're going to OFFICIALLY move forward with the impeachment, right? Or is the left still playing games because they KNOW they won't win.

FirstCensorshipThenJail
FirstCensorshipThenJail 4 months

Communism has and will never work. Socialist is not the solution to your problem it is cause of your problems.

FirstCensorshipThenJail
FirstCensorshipThenJail 4 months

Democrats = Communists The Democrats hate America and American citizens. Stop funding and voting for Democrats. It is like sell bullets to the guy that has already told you he is going to shoot you.

Paul C
Paul C 4 months

What the fuck kind of goofy 'news' is this? They don't even know if there is a second person or not: "Zaid told me he doesn’t know if his new client is the same whistleblower identified by the NYT."

Morbo
Morbo 4 months

Seriously wtf? A second whistle blower? Whats he going to tell us the entire trans script of the conversation didn't? Are journalists retarded now? Is that a thing?

PhreneticNI
PhreneticNI 4 months

If an intelligence community member has first-hand knowledge, that would mean that someone in the intelligence community was wire tapping the president's call to a foreign leader, so either there is something entirely improper going on in the intelligence community, or he/she does not have first hand knowledge.

OttersGonnaOtt
OttersGonnaOtt 4 months

If you say you have 1 whistleblower regarding the Ukrainian phone call, yet the phone call checks out as clean, it doesn't matter if you add 200 more whistleblowers to that list because the matter has already been cleared. Proving there are more people concerned about Trump's actions or trying to get him out of office doesn't add credibility to a claim. Just because you really want something to happen doesn't make it happen.

Top in Politics
Get the App