Former CIA Director John Brennan said Wednesday that ’at least one voter’ was swayed by Russia’s campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Brennan acknowledged that the view was his own and did not reflect on the intelligence agency.
Google and Facebook tampering with search results and such swayed millions more votes than 'Russian operatives' could ever hope for.
It is 3 years later and the Russians bought ads for Bernie, Trump AND Hillary. You don't think they have been buying newspaper and TV ads for decades?
Whatever Brennan you horrible disgrace.
The horse is not only dead it’s just a bloody clump of meat at this point.
Yeah at least one..wow..
so Facebook and Twitter and all the liberal media didn't sway anyone at all did they?
one vote. um ok. there are probably multiple votes influenced by schizofrenic hallucinations.
Says the evil POS who illegally spied on a US citizen running for President and was part of the fake Steele Dossier paid for by Clinton and the DNC from the Russians what a coincidence
All of this division and hard wedges being driven in is a Russian operation to destabilize the US amd it's working.
Is this where they believe anyone with a non human profile picture is considered a Russian bot? It would be very boomer of him.
Says the person that okayed the visa for the 911 terroist. I have such high regard for your intelligence skill. You seem really competent.
...Duh! Who cares? Do you have any evidence that it was the Russian GOVERNMENT?
yea I think four or five votes were swayed.
any outside interference is a negative but its very unsafe to try to make a case by stating that 'one' voter was swayed. its already a given. if a country as prominent as russia fails to change the outcome of 1 vote of a body of 300 million, then they should probably give up espionage altogether. foreign interference is not a consequence, it is an expectation.
that being said, this just sounds like an attempt to blame an individual for a factor that is and will forever be. espionage and election tampering is a basic expectation of human diplomacy. that doesnt always mean its a coordinated effort. never forget that 'zero' is something that only exists in a vacuum.
Translation: "At least one voter read an RT article critical of Hillary Clinton." This is their biggest finding so far! Russian interference!
The subliminal message our intelligence agencies are admitting to... "Our elections can be swayed by intelligence agencies".
Of course, our CIA would never engage in such things...
Google did manipulate the vote using ephemeral experiences and nudge technology. That has been confirmed by Dr. Epstine and the 3 million popular vote. And recently by Hilary Clinton in an interview where she described exactly googles ephemeral experiences as if she had been briefed on the subject by an Alphabet senior executive. Like, say, Eric.
Hilarious!! Did he really say "at least one"? So funny! Russia didn't make ME vote for Trump - Hillary did.
I didn't know they let retards be CIA directors.
Exactly how many votes were influenced, to what extent and how can be stop/mitigate it?
I voted for Trump, and not because of some fucking Russians.
This comment may be in violation of our guidelines. You can still post it, but it will remain hidden until reviewed by one of our moderators.
This comment may be a reaction with little substance. It's at risk of being ranked lower than other comments.
Quality over quantity. You've hit our limit for comments posted. Please try again in an hour.