Officials have not discovered evidence of voter fraud: Georgia’s Lt. Governor
Geoff Duncan, the Lieutenant Gov. of Georgia dismissed claims by staffers for President Trump’s re-election campaign who had maintained that a recount of the votes in Georgia will reveal evidence of ’improperly harvested ballots and other irregularities that will prove that President Trump won Georgia fairly.’ Commenting on the same, Duncan said his office had not seen evidence of widespread fraud
They keep using the qualifier "widespread". Does this mean that there's evidence of non-widespread voter fraud?
I'm not American, the election was rife with fraud. Statistically, mathematically, sociologically and politically, in an ironic sense. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-does-a-crooked-election-look-like/ In an ironic twist of fate, the hundreds of ways people tried to identify fraud in the 2016 election that came back negative now show positive fraud results across the board, with key markers signifying that the democratic party did not host a fair election in key swing states, whilst Republican parties did. Is this not, at the very least, an indicator that an investigation should be held to maintain the security and reliability of a free democratic election? Results for or against, regardless of party or political affiliation?
Lmao who could've guessed.
See, they always say widespread. If the voter fraud is concentrated in just a few key districts, then it can effectively swing the election and still not be "widespread". It's a game a semantics. There is definitely voter fraud that has swung the election in key areas, turning entire states. But since it is concentrated on those key areas, it can be claimed it is not widespread.
There's that word "widespread" again. Would it be "widespread" if it happened in, say, a handful of polling stations (out of ~80,000) in 5 major cities? Because you might not even need THAT many irregularities to tip this election. Additionally, there are many types of "fraud", and not all of them are intentional. Look I don't need this guy's MSM talking points to make sense of this. 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙜𝙖'𝙚 𝙞𝙩, and don't refuse to investigate 𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩--regardless of who asks or why. 𝗪𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲.
I live in Georgia and no one is saying anything about 'widespread' voter fraud. It is just a handful of counties. This comment from the Lt. Governor is also why he's now being asked to resign.
The Governors and other officials shouldn't have a problem with an audit cause it's all above board. There was a 2yr investigation into "Russian collusion" what's wrong with an audit?
Of course, when you dismiss and ignore PROOF (not evidence) that it's happening, you won't see it.
2016: Russia hacked our election. 2020: Election irregularities are impossible. Well, which is it?
Well.... I guess he couldn’t find his own rear cavity with a topographical map and his AND his neighbours hands...
It doesn't take "widespread" voter fraud to manipulate a election, especially with a electoral collage. All that is needed is just enough votes in just the right places. Manufactured illegal votes are the easiest to accomplish this but the most reliable is absentee ballots for 'older' voters in cemeteries. This is has happened multiple times in the past 70 years with a few prosecutions and convictions.
Of course this won't be enough to convince the red hats, no doubt there will be plenty links with the accompanying mantra of "this should be strongly investigated".
I love the left saying "just get over it" when they clearly couldn't do that last election. Joe Biden isn't president. You guys just listen to the media and think they are right about everything, you dont do any real thinking.
Lots of funny business going on here... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-breaking-news-georgia-132000-ballots-fulton-county-georgia-identified-likely-ineligible/
"Who broke the window?" "Not us" Did you expect a different answer regardless of whether they actually did it or not?
Did it ever occur to you rioters, I mean Democrats that Trumps people will have to prove something with evidence ? If they don’t have it then good for you but if they do you will be back to burning businesses down and killing people. You may want to go easy on your comments your egos may bite you in the rear plus your leader said to be peaceful, I know you’ve never heard that from democrats before but chill out, you may need your energy starting a civil war if your guy has his chair taken back.
Cause there is no fraud.
Putin makes the same comments about Russian elections. Don't believe him either.
Can someone explain to me why these people aren't outraged over the countless attempts by the right to discard Texas ballots?
A republican saying there’s no evidence of fraud. What will it take for the cultists to accept their god emperor has lost?