Join our growing community to challenge mainstream media bias and fix the news
Reward for Proof of Fraud

Reward for Proof of Fraud

Texas Lt. Gov Dan Patrick is offering $1 million in rewards to people who can help uncover conclusive voter fraud in the presidential election. To receive the reward, one must provide evidence that leads to both an arrest and conviction of voter fraud. The minimum reward is $25,000, to be paid from Patrick’s campaign funds. At the time of writing, no claims have yet led to payout.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ devout centrist
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ devout centrist
Jim 2 months

How do you liberals take a completely reasonable thing and turn it into something that’s dirty and offensive ? How in the hell is it wrong to weed out all fraud ? Y’all protect it like it’s your mother. You spent 4 years telling us Trump was a benefactor of a fraudulent election but now you defend the elections with the exact same energy you’ve been saying they are tampered with. ‘No proof of WIDESPREAD fraud’ means you admit there’s proof of some fraud !!!!! Why does it hurt you to do recounts and periodic voter registration updates ? Can’t you look and see if a dead person is still registered ? Why do you insist that they remain so ? Do you leave dead people on the social security rolls ? Do you continue Medicare after they die ? No you remove them from the benefits list, right ? Please explain, how voting is subject to fraud for 4 years and now, boom ! You just flip on your own narrative. Why do you oppose cleaning it up ?

porcus 2 months

Seems like a reasonable approach, let's see if anyone is able to claim the prize. There has already been a Mexia social worker arrested and charged with 143 counters of election fraud, so there is a non-zero chance of someone in Texas being able to claim this prize.

hooman of hoomanland
hooman of hoomanland 2 months

Why didn’t they offer a reward for Biden’s laptop or Hillary’s emails? I mean they didn’t even offer a reward to help build the wall!!! I want a refund

kinG 2 months

I agree voter fraud is wrong, but where were you conservatives when liberals were saying the was interference in the 2016 election? Could we do a recount then, even when it was proven that there was interference??

M. Schlegel
M. Schlegel 2 months

Well was there SOME fraud? Yes, absolutely yes. In an election that big there is always something. That’s why you should be careful if a presidential election hinges on a few hundred voters in one state. But that’s not the situation, to turn the election there would’ve been needed to be widespread institutional fraud. Let’s let the courts work and if you know of fraud denounce it. I’m not against such incentives but I don’t think it’ll have that much of an effect. I’m curious though on which side will be more fraud, my bet would currently be for more instances of republicans committing fraud. Eitherway there is nothing atm suggesting that this might fundamentally change the outcome.

Alex10 2 months

Really pulling out all the stop to please the emperor 🤣 Just so he can claim it was rigged and why he lost lol

Doug 2 months

Red herring. Nobody has been claiming that Texas was a hotbed of voter fraud during this election cycle.

Gaunt Dusk
Gaunt Dusk 2 months

I appreciate the effort but why would voter fraud occur in texas? That's kinda harder to do and texas is no swing state. Swing states getting fraudulent votes I can see.

Cajun 2 months

I got a tip for y'all: Stop the rat-f*cking.

Top in U.S.